home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Offline 2 / NetNews Offline Volume 2.iso / news / comp / sys / amiga / misc-part1 / 6953 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1996-08-05  |  1.8 KB
  1. Path: ix.netcom.com!netnews
  2. From: cprohman@ix.netcom.com (Carl Rohman)
  3. Newsgroups: alt.2600,alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc,alt.destroy.microsoft,alt.fan.bill-gates,alt.wired,comp.infosystems.www.browsers.ms-windows,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.win95.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.win95.setup,alt.sex.anal,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.os.os2.misc,comp.sys.amiga.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.adventure,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.misc,comp.unix.unixware.misc
  4. Subject: Re: Will anyone buy NT?? (Yes - Intelligent People)
  5. Date: Mon, 04 Mar 1996 04:49:22 GMT
  6. Organization: Netcom
  7. Message-ID: <4hdsph$hn@cloner3.netcom.com>
  8. References: <4ef48q$rik@news.iag.net> <iLFDxYWClVjE089yn@ibm.net> <4ejvl5$aag@er5.rutgers.edu> <4es2kg$cer@news.ais.net> <quiksilvDM6w33.8LI@netcom.com> <Pine.SOL.3.91.960203235010.8473B-100000@howard> <4f3aqn$f4u@milo.freenet.vancouver.bc.ca> <3116b1d5.53797777@ixnews2.ix.netcom.com> <311D75C6.40E0@ix.netcom.com> <poulosioDMzy0J.4zL@netcom.com> <4gat5s$shh@emerald.oz.net> <Dn3LHB.M6C@iquest.net> <Supersede.Dn3sy8.CsG@iquest.net> <312B0660.63F3@mts.se> <4ghi50$2ud@hp01.redwood.nl> <312d0457.98211244@nntp.ix.netcom.com>
  9. NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-lin-ne1-04.ix.netcom.com
  10. X-NETCOM-Date: Sun Mar 03  8:49:53 PM PST 1996
  11. X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
  12.  
  13. budbrown@ix.netcom.com (Roland Brown) wrote:
  14.  
  15. <snip>
  16. >Actually, IMHO the OS wars, although seemingly over, could turn into a
  17. >real WILD horse race if either OS/2 or Win95 had a half-dozen gifted
  18. >ASM programmers optimizing it for speed and to run like wind on 4
  19. >megs.  Heck, I remember multi tasking very smoothly on mainframes with
  20. >64k (note: not 64 megs) back in the 70's.  Of course the architecture
  21. >was quiet different, but its amazing what a really competent ASM
  22. >programmer can do.  :-)
  23.  
  24. Yes, but writing in Assembler requires a brain.
  25.  
  26.